๐Ÿ‘€ You're viewing someone's saved rubric โ€” run your own.
Vibe Drop ยท interactive gift

Stop scoring your agent zero at 90% done.

Binary pass/fail is a correct hard gate and a terrible hill-climbing signal. Score the run continuously โ€” then watch how much signal binary erases.

Built on Ken Huang's "Stop Scoring Agents Zero at 90% Done". Benchmark numbers below are from his piece (Android Bench 2.0).

See it: the signal binary erases

Real leaderboard numbers from the essay. Pick an agent-harness run โ€” binary pass rate vs. continuous completion.

32.7%
Binary pass rate
84.7%
Continuous completion

Claude Opus 5.5 ยท claude-code โ€” avg latency 15.2h ยท avg cost $215.4 ยท CI 18.7โ€“47.3

๐Ÿ“‰ Binary says "failed." Continuous says 84.7% of the engineering work landed. Same run โ€” one score erases the other.
"You cannot improve what your score collapses to a coin flip." โ€” Ken Huang

Build it: your continuous rubric

Score a recent agent run across dimensions. Binary stays the headline โ€” completion is the hill-climbing supplement.

100%
Binary
โ€“
Completion

Anti-patterns (from the essay)

๐Ÿ”ฌ The exact-keys pattern (named, not specified)

The essay names two further patterns without full mechanics: exact-key simulated estates (grade against exact keys inside simulated worlds โ€” answers whether the answer is right when production is a mess of CRMs and tickets) and typed-decision judges (gate and judge with typed decisions). They're design directions, not recipes โ€” the continuous-rubric design above is the fully specified mechanic.

Share this rubric

Replay link โ€” anyone who opens it sees your dimensions, weights, and the binary-vs-completion delta.

Retake with fresh inputs โ†’